RE: APPEAL PROGRESS ON E35YM6602
Yahoo
/
Sent
Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>
To:
Central London DJSKEL, Enquiries Central London County
Cc: omar.sagher@governmentlegal.gov.uk
Wed, 27 Apr at 11:36
To
The Circuit Judge
County Court of Central London
Dear Your Honour Judge
I have not heard anything from numerous institutions since I last wrote to you on my pending Appeal of the attached Court Orders and it makes me very concerned for I have paid the £100 Court Fee for this Appeal:
CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660dated19January2021_receivedbyClaimantfirstat9.27amon23March2021.pdf
Central London CountyCourtOrder 21 June 2021 (DistrictJudgeLightman)pdf.
The developments of the past few weeks are condensed for your examination in the attached skeleton argument that I am currently preparing as a Section of the Book 'The Allurement of Reality': CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION AS A DEFENCE-digital.pdf which you will find self-explanatory.
I should be grateful for a Hearing of this Appeal with the Prime Minister Mr Boris Johnson as the Defendant.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel 07967789619
Download all attachments as a zip file
(a) CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660dated19January2021_receivedbyClaimantfirstat9.27amon22March2021-1.pdf 54.7kB
(b) CentralLondonCountyCourtOrder 21 June 2021 (District Judge Lightman).pdf 783.5kB
(c) CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION AS A DEFENCE-digital.pdf 595kB:
(a)
General Form of Judgment or Order
In the County Court at Central London
Claim Number E35YM660
Date 19 January 2021
(The County Court Sealed)
DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref
MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1ST Defendant Ref Z1819776/H019
Before His Honour Judge Parfitt sitting at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.
On the Court hearing the Appellant but the Appellant withdrawing from the telephone hearing after making his submission and on the Appellant’s request to reconsider the permission to appeal refused by HHJ Letham by Order dated 30 September 2019
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The request to reconsider permission is refused.
2. The Appellant;s application was totally without merit: the DDJ’s Order was wholly appropriate as a case management order and the stated grounds of appeal that the
Appellant lacked access to legal advice was hopeless and the oral argument put forward that the DDJ was a liar acting as part of a conspiracy to silence the Appellant was absurd (both in its premise and in its substance – since the order under appeal gave the Appellant a final chance to make his particulars of claim good).
3. The Respondent’s application for costs of the action must be referred to a DJ pursuant to CPR 3.5 (2)(a) and the Respondent’s letter dated 13 January 2021 and two cost schedules contained in the Appeal bundle (in pdf format) shall be treated as application in that respect.
4. The Respondent’s costs of the appeal are to be treated as Respondent’s costs in the action.
Dated 19 January 2021
In compliance with GDPR requirements the privacy notice sets out the standards that you can expect from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) when we process personal data about you in the context of civil court proceedings; how you can get access to a copy of your personal data; and what you can do ir you think standards are not being met. Please see link below for further information:
____________________________________________________________________The Court office at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the Claim Number. Tel 0300 123 5577. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter#hmcts-privacy-policy
N24 General Form of Judgment or Order
Produced by L Alonso
CJR 0065C
___________________________________________________________________
(b)
General Form of Judgment or Order
In the County Court at Central London
Claim Number E35YM660
Date 21 June 2021
(The County Court Sealed)
DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref
MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1ST Defendant Ref Z1819776/H019
Before District Judge Lightman sitting at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. It is recorded that:
(a). The Court has sought to join the Claimant in the BT Meet Me hearing listed for today at 11.40 am. The Court telephoned at least thrice the Claimant on the telephone number given by him in his application dated 19 June 2021 as 07967789619 but the telephone was not picked up.
(b) The application dated 19 June 2021 of the Claimant to adjourn be refused.
(c) Today’s hearing is merely to assess costs. The District Judge today has no other jurisdiction.
2. The Claim Form having been struck out, judgment for the Defendant.
3. Claimant shall pay the Defendant’s costs assessed in total as £4,170 payable by 4 pm on 5 July 2021.
Dated 21 June 2021
___________________________________________________________________
The Court office at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the Claim Number. Tel 0300 123 5577. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.
N1 General Form of Judgment or Order
Produced by S. Mirza
CJR 005C
____________________________________________________________________
RE: APPEAL PROGRESS ON E35YM6602
Yahoo
/
Sent
Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>
To:
Shantanu Panigrahi
Wed, 27 Apr at 11:31
Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.
Thank You
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
コメント